RapTV
Entertainment

The Untold Story of Ye’s ‘In Whose Name’

How Nico Ballesteros turned 3,000 hours of Ye footage into a compelling documentary.

Ye’s story has been told a million times through headlines, tweets, and TMZ clips—but never like this. In Whose Name, the new documentary from first-time director Nico Ballesteros, is already pulling critical love (4 stars from The Guardian, 86% on Rotten Tomatoes, and a $776K opening weekend—huge numbers for a doc with almost no marketing).

The film premiered in about 1,000 theatres across the U.S. on Sept 19. For now, screenings are limited to U.S. theaters only (AMC, Regal, Cinemark, Fandango) with tickets available on the documentary’s site. No word yet on streaming.

What makes it different? The film distills 3,000 hours of footage into a front-row look at some of Ye’s infamous highs and lows. You’ll see Kim Kardashian crying in a Ugandan yurt, Michael Che cussing him out backstage at SNL, and Ye screaming down the phone at Jared Kushner because he needs to enter the White House “the exact way a foreign dignitary would go!”

There’s archival footage with Drake back when they were on good terms, plus scenes from the Donda livestreams where Ye hit the stage with Playboi Carti and Marilyn Manson. A private meeting with Elon Musk in a foam-padded room even turns weirdly funny when they start venting about baby mama drama.

But unlike Netflix’s 2022 Jeen-Yuhs, there are no talking heads or tidy explanations. Just chaos, genius, and contradictions—an observational study of the human, not the idol. For longtime Ye stans, this will hit harder than any doc before it.

And while the film itself is already a cultural artifact, the untold story is how it came together. We spoke with Nico Ballesteros—who went from 18-year-old art school kid to Ye’s shadow from 2018 to 2024—about the craziness of his experience and what he learned documenting hip-hop’s most polarizing figure up close.

What did this project teach you about the cost of fame?

Nico Ballesteros: I’m still digesting what all of this means in terms of the equation of fame, but one of the themes was always how hard it is to interpret the life of someone famous. That’s why I chose an observational style—a kind of Rorschach test for the audience instead of telling them how to feel.

 

After years of documenting him, how did your perspective on Ye evolve?

For me, it was always about understanding the human beneath the idol. That perspective stayed consistent throughout—balancing empathy with the objectivity of a documentary filmmaker.

 

What was the process of cutting down 3,000 hours of footage into the final edit?

It was like sculpting—kind of that Michelangelo idea of removing everything that wasn’t David. We began with thousands of hours strung out, watched them meticulously, then moved to transcripts and scene cards to get perspective. It was a process of constantly watching the material down and chipping away at it, rather than pulling from memory thinking I knew what the story was.

 

What are some things that got left on the cutting room floor?

A lot of music studio sessions and Yeezy design moments with shoes and apparel—things that are fascinating but needed more context. Since day one, I knew this would be an observational documentary, not a participatory one. I didn’t want narration. The goal was to immerse viewers in a first-person perspective, and some of those scenes required explanation that would have pulled us out of that approach.

Nico with Jonah Hill and Ye.

Was there a Ye album that stood out as your favorite to witness in the making?

Yandhi was monumental to me—I was 18, and some of those tracks were my absolute favorite to see [them] get created. What fascinated me most, though, was seeing how albums evolved: how Yandhi became Jesus Is King, how God’s Country became Donda, and years later became Utopia.

 

How did the Jesus Is King era reflect Ye’s headspace at the time?

That whole era—Jesus Is King and Sunday Service—was my favorite to film. The Sunday Services brought healing, unity, and community, and even the architecture projects like the domes added another layer. I was documenting objectively but I felt very filled spiritually from that era.

Nico with Ye at Sunday Service Opera.

Was there an interest of Ye’s that surprised you while filming?

Architecture. I didn’t expect it to be such a major through line, but it became one of my favorite stories to follow. Ye’s gone from producing to rapping to design, and architecture felt like the next frontier. I was grateful—and inspired—to capture that evolution.

 

What sacrifices did you make to commit six years to documenting Ye?

When I first started traveling with Ye, my sleep schedule went from six or seven hours a night to maybe two to four for weeks at a time. We were constantly moving—from Calabasas to New York, Chicago, even Colombia. I remember calling my manager and saying, ‘I know this is what I’m meant to do, but I don’t know how I’ll physically sustain it.’ Then I thought about the people who’d already spent eight years with Ye, and I realized I was only 18—I could be 26 by the end. It became this prophetic moment for me. I just decided to stick it out, because this is what I was called to do.

Nico with Ye en route to the White House.

What was your biggest takeaway about Ye’s influence?

I remember Rick Rubin playing Comethazine for him in 2018, and he was listening to triple X or WorldstarHipHop. It’s just the same reason why I was so inspired—it was his ability to find new emerging talent and understand the evolving language of artistry in our time.